Kyrie Irving has been making headlines . Last night, Irving hosted a Zoom call with over 200 players, calling for many to take a stand against the league. With all of the protests going on right now, . Instead, Irving believes their energy should be on trying to create social change. The Brooklyn Nets star sees the return of basketball as a distraction from what is truly important and is hoping players realize that.

Today, Austin Rivers issued a lengthy argument against what Irving is preaching. As you can see in the tweet below, Rivers believes players can play basketball while advocating for social change at the same time. Rivers also notes that not every player makes as much as Kyrie and that not playing could hurt them financially.

From there, Rivers also explained the ramifications a boycott could have on the CBA. If games aren’t played, the league won’t make its TV revenues which will ultimately lead to a massive reduction in the salary cap. Knowing Kyrie’s history, we would be the first to speak up against a reduction in salaries, so Rivers most certainly makes a great point.

As of right now, there is definitely a divide amongst the players and only time will tell whether or not it works itself out.